Constitutionality of Section 377 IPC

An introduction not for nothing, the good German thinker, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe once said, i’m what i’m , so take me as i’m . the most motive of this text is to decriminalize same sex relationships in our country which comes under section 377 of Indian legal code.

Meaning of Homosexuals and Problems Faced by Them

Homosexuality refers to sexual behaviour between two members of an equivalent sex or gender. As a sexual orientation, homosexuality is an everlasting pattern of emotional, romantic and love sexual attractions to people of an equivalent sex. the foremost spoken term by the people for the homosexual ones are recognized as lesbian for females and gay for males. Commonly both of them that’s the homosexual males and females are ask as gay. With bisexuals and heterosexuals, homosexuals also are one among the most categories in our society on the other hand too they’re penalized from time to time for what the character had made them.
Discrimination to homosexuals by the society is prevailing since ages.

What is Section 377?

Section 377 refers to ‘unnatural offences’ and says whoever voluntarily has carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal, shall be punished and can be imprisonment for all times , or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may be reach 10 years, and shall even be susceptible to pay a fine.

Implications for heterosexuals

Section 377 also included consensual sexual acts of adults like oral and sodomy privately which were treated as unusual and punishable.

Is ‘Section 377’ legitimate?

Coming from different parts of the country with diverse religion, age, sex and other backgrounds, the petitioners said that section 377 legitimises the stigma related to sexual orientation and its expression something which is important , fundam
The Supreme Court has scrapped Section 377 of the IPC, decriminalising the 158-year-old colonial law which criminalises consensual gay sex.

Criticism and Support

People mostly criticize on what they can’t understand, are the lines said by by Dickens was clearly evident after the judgment by Supreme Court. Not only the person but also peoples possessing status within the society went for supporting the Section 377 and criticizing the LGBT group. From Baba Ramdev to Rajnath Singh, and from P.P Malhotra (Solicitor General) to leaders of Samajwadi Party, all of them were those that who clearly were in support of the Section and against of Homosexuality. Decriminalising the section may create a breach of peace within the society, was the statement said by P.P Malhotra.

The one that have many followers within the world, Baba Ramdev called homosexuality a nasty addiction which is getting common within the youths. Homosexuality went also against the Hindutva and Indian Culture, consistent with the vice chairman of Vishwa Hindu Parishad. Love and affection to someone may be a phenomenon that exists within the minds and brains of the people, have now become a neighborhood of distinct religions prevailing within the society. Till now we use to tie people from any specific religion, and now society is prepared now to tie the minds too.

Legislative action

On 18 December 2015, Lok Sabha member Shashi tharoor of the Indian national congress, whose leaders and Rahul Gandhi had earlier expressed support for LGBT Rights, introduced a personal members bill to exchange Section 377 within the Indian legal code and decriminalize consensual same-sex relations. The bill was defeated in presentation , 71–24. For his part, Tharoor expressed surprise at the bill’s rejection at this early stage. He said that he didn’t have time to rally support which he will plan to reintroduce the bill. in march 2016, Tharoor tried to reintroduce the private member’s bill to decriminalize homosexuality, but was voted down for the second time.


Constitutions aren’t merely charters of governance; they’re also ethical documents that lay down a collective commitment that members of a community make to line principles and to every other about the type of life they might wish to pursue. Thus, the political form that we elect to control our societies isn’t separable from the way during which we elect to control ourselves as individuals and in our relationships to every others. Who or how i select to like is, then, both a private choice and an issue of political form and expression. Following Jawaharlal Nehru’s Quote included within the court’s judgment of words being ‘magical things’, a method of reading the constitution is to ascertain it as a city of words built on the inspiration promise made in its preambletowards securing for its citizen Justice, Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity. it’s important to recall that these are virtues that justify why we give ourselves a constitution. The campaigns for law reform aren’t merely for a right to possess sex, but to be ready to live a life without worrying of arrest, detention and harassment. No country can defend its anti-sodomy laws on the idea of cultural, moral or religious arguments if they otherwise commit themselves to human rights. Decriminalisation of consensual sex between adults goes to the core of human rights and dignity. Anti-sodomy laws are a historical wrong that must be rectified. The recent victory within the Delhi supreme court with decriminalisation of consensual sodomy by the reading down of Section 377 may be a huge breakthrough not only for India, except for the worldwide battle against antisodomy laws. Countries like Hong Kong , South Africa and Fiji in Asia and Africa have already shown us the way by decriminalising consensual sex, in lieu of their commitment to human rights for all. an identical step is required to be undertaken by us so as to satisfy our commitments to constitutional values. The divergent views of Delhi supreme court & of Supreme court of India, over-ruling HC’S verdict, has clearly established the SC intention of putting the ball within the court of parliament. Therefore, the assumptions made within the hypotheses that there’s no effect of homosexual activities on the health of person & society at large is additionally found 250 incorrect. the idea that there’ll be no effect of legalization of homosexuality in Indian legal, social & form of government is additionally found to be non- convincing as a partial legalization of homosexuality in 2009, has successfully affected the LGBT Activism & has brought a replacement wave of hope in socio-legal & political environment of India.


2 thoughts on “Constitutionality of Section 377 IPC”

Leave a Comment