The women are discriminated within the country from a long time. They had been treated in an exceedingly very unfair manner. It is a disgrace to the people of India who worship goddess but have no respect for the women out there in the country. The country has been striving ever since the independence to guard the ladies from discrimination. The Marriam- Webster Dictionary defined discrimination as “the practice of unfairly treating an individual or group of people differently from people or groups of individuals.” Discrimination strikes at the very heart of human being. It is treating someone differently just because of who they are or what they believe. We all have the right to be treated equally, no matter our race, ethnicity, nationality, class, caste, religion, belief, sex, language, sexual orientation, identity, age, health or other status. Yet only too often we hear heart-breaking stories of individuals that suffer cruelty simply for belonging to a “different” group from those in power.

According to the census of the year 2011, the gender ratio in India was 940 females per 1000 males. This shows an upward trend when put next to the 2001 census data. Within the year 2001, the gender ratio was 933 females per 1000 males. As the number of ladies within the country increases, the Indian judiciary has come up with many laws to support woman within the country. Crimes against women are increasing every day and today women don’t seem to be safe, even in their own homes. It’s important for each woman in India to grasp the laws that are put in situ to guard them.


This has been long overdue and Muslim women are steadfastly demanding it for several years now, this can be a historic success within the movement for gender justice by ordinary women. Muslim women are denied legal parity with Hindu and Christian women who enjoy a semblance of protection under the codified laws like Hindu Marriage Act and also the Indian Divorce Act. This is often to not suggest that patriarchy has been abolished from our society and polity, but in a very democracy legal justice is vital.

In the last over a decade, Muslim women began raising their voices against the practice of Triple Talaq. Several women approached the Supreme Court, came out openly publicly, demanding this injustice must stop. Women reminded the government and people about their constitutional obligation to enable all women, including Muslim women, obtain gender justice. It’s unfortunate that this law failed to pass with a unanimous pick out Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. The political parties refuse to work out the writing on the wall about the demand for change coming from within the Muslim community. They appear to believe that this is often the prerogative of the patriarchal clerics and not the ladies themselves. Law making is that the prerogative and indeed a requirement of the legislature in an exceedingly democracy.

The argument given by the opposition is that if a husband is shipped to jail for pronouncing triple talaq, who will provide for the wife when her husband is in jail? He remains the husband in regards of Shayara Bano’s judgment, and hence she cannot remarry. If this reasoning is accepted, then no husband should ever be sent to jail, whether or not he has committed murder, rape, robbery, cheating or the other offence, for then his wife and kids will starve. If a person having a wife commits honour killing of his daughter for marrying outside the caste or religion, or commits dowry killing of his daughter-in-law, he shouldn’t be sent to jail or be hanged for that who will then provide for his wife? If a married policeman commits a fake encounter or custodial death, he mustn’t be punished. The logic of the opposition parties is specious.

To kill a feudal, backward and barbaric practice, strong action by the state is required, whether or not there are some adverse consequences. India is passing through a transitional period in its history, and to move forward, we must suppress backward, feudal, reactionary and barbaric practices. And once we hew wood, some chips will fly. Practice of nikah halala is obnoxious.


Domestic abuse is a district of women’s rights that has not got the eye it needs in India though it’s one among the numerous problems that ladies face daily. Our system can in no way match that within the UK, but there don’t seem to be even rudimentary systems in situ for victims of force. The National Family Health Survey 4 (NFHS-4) says that each third woman in India faces some style of force, 27% of them since the age of 15. The Protection of ladies from force Act, 2005, could be a comprehensive law, but like many other such laws, it fails within the implementation. Of all the ladies abused, only 14% have sought any variety of help. There are many reasons for this.

One is that several women in India don’t even know that there’s a law to support them. Many abused women take it as normal to be beaten or emotionally abused for a spread of issues, starting from not taking care of the house to an adequate degree to failing to pander to her husband’s needs. Surprising, a sizeable number of girls are supportive of force. The NFHS-4 survey found that 54.8% agree that the violence is justified, with 47.7% of girls within the people of 15-19 saying that the husband had a right to beat his wife.

Domestic violence in middle and upper crust homes is commonly kept covert so the last name isn’t undermined. Women who are exposed to their mothers being abused, or who lack economic means, head to great lengths to justify staying on in abusive marriages or relationships. We have only a few domestic abuse counsellors in India, and therefore the police, who are the primary port of incorporate a victim, often do little over warn the husband and so send the lady back to the abusive home. This has often proved dangerous in some ways. The abused woman suffers serious health problems, sleep and eating disorders, mental trauma and even suicidal impulses. within the worst case scenarios, she is killed or maimed. One avenue to assist women, especially those that sleep in the agricultural areas, is that the panchayats.

However, studies by the International Centre for Research on Women show that girls don’t approach the panchayat as an establishment, but would rather head to the sarpanch in a very personal capacity. But the system is rooted during a patriarchal environment that upholds male privilege and also the woman is sometimes counselled to ‘adjust’, that terrible omnibus word that cloaks a large number of abuses, and return home for the sake of the family. Four-fifths of all abused women in India don’t seek help from anyone except, within the odd instance, their families. There are such a big amount of positive legal reforms within the area of women’s rights, but they continue to be largely inaccessible to abused women. The Bollywood quite abused woman who rises to hunt vengeance isn’t the solution. this is often a controversy which needs specialised redressal, a minimum of starting with domestic abuse counsellors attached to police stations. With a dynamic women and child development minster in situ, we could make a start on this now.


Breaking it down, Section 497 Indian legal code (IPC) says that any man who has sexuality with the wife of another man, without the consent of her husband, shall be held to blame for the crime of adultery. The law doesn’t confer any right women to prosecute the adulterous husband, or the girl with whom the husband has indulged in sexual issues. In simple words, the husband solely has been permitted to prosecute the adulterer.

The law intrinsically is predicated on discrimination because it punishes only the person and spares the lady. There’s no rationale in treating one party involved in adultery as a victim and also the other as a criminal. In doing so, the law violates article 14 of the constitution since it creates an irrational classification between men and girls. Within the present world, where women hold positions of authority in most spheres, the premise that the lady is usually the ‘victim’ not only undermines the notion of women’s agency but is also entirely unfair to men.

The law treats married women because the ‘property’ of their husbands on the bottom that their relationship with other married persons depends on the “consent or connivance of her husband”, which also implies that a girl can sleep outside her marriage with the ‘consent’ of her husband. The law gives power to a husband to regulate the sexuality of his lawfully wedded wife. Monoandry, quite the protection of the sanctity of a social institution, therefore, seems to be the essential premise of the law. The law allows the husband to regulate the sexuality of his wife so as to claim this sole claim to her body. Besides the plain gender discrimination that the law provides space for, the adultery law is problematic for several other reasons.

The law gives a better half a right in charge an outdoor agency for the breakdown of his marriage. If a wife has chosen to sleep outside her marriage, it’s important that the couple looks at the inadequacies in their own relationship and not hold an outsider answerable for the breakdown of their marriage. And if the connection has lost its foundation of trust, it makes more sense that the couple approaches the courts for a mutual divorce than put a 3rd person responsible bars for breaking their marriage.

The law only provides a psychological outlet to a spouse accountable a 3rd author for the failure of a wedding. It is still to be seen where the current debate on the law within the Supreme Court leads the judiciary to, although the apex court has opined that this provision wrongfully treats women as property and is against our fundamental right to life. The court has also observed that adultery as a ground for divorce may be viewed as ground for reasonable restriction, which doesn’t mean that there’s no sexual autonomy. It means “there are valid limits to your sexual autonomy.”

Author: Niharika Tiwari,

Leave a Comment